Tuesday, November 5, 2019

Parks Are The Heart Of Cities

     All cities need a park at their heart -

From the Washington Post -

In the heart of Madrid, a park for all seasons

August 9, 2019 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
 
 
When I moved to Madrid last spring, I thought El Parque Retiro would merely be my running route. Since then, the nearly 400-year-old park has become so much more: a refuge, a playground, a people-watching hub, an entertainment venue.

One could call the park Madrid’s beating heart, a verdant retreat for tourists and locals alike right in the middle of the city. (Its location is so good, in fact, that Napoleon’s troops set up their headquarters there during the Spanish War of Independence.)

Hundreds of species of trees, plants and flowers thrive in Retiro along meandering trails and bubbling streams. It also has marble monuments, spectacular rose gardens and a placid lake. In Madrid, a city without a coastline or a roaring river, it is the most enticing place to experience nature, far superior to the vast expanses of Casa Campo, the old hunting grounds located on the Royal Palace’s outskirts.
 
Flanking the park are a few of Madrid’s major tourism attractions: the world-renowned Prado, the Puerta de Alcala, and the Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza. Each neighborhood surrounding the park also has a different flavor — bourgeois Salamanca to the north with its Fifth Avenue-style Calle Serrano; trendy Malasaña to the west; and Atocha to the south, featuring the Royal Palace and Madrid’s main train station (the site of the devastating 2004 terrorist attacks).

Every person comes to the park searching for something different. The locals come seeking peaceful contemplation during their lunchtime siestas; a green place to jog or bounce a soccer ball away from city traffic; or a seat at the glass Retiro Library where they can chew on the words of Miguel de Cervantes from yellowed copies of “Don Quixote.”

For tourists, it is a place to imagine the noblemen and women who once frequented the gardens, to glide across the great lake in a wooden canoe, or to take in an art exhibit at the Palacio Velazquez.

Wonder after wonder

I happened upon the enchanted wonders of Retiro one by one — as if they were surprises left for me to discover by a devious fairy, or perhaps the green elf that plays the flute atop a crumbling edifice in my favorite garden.
 
First, it was the peacocks. Entering the park from Principe de Vergara, I first passed through the pink remains of an 11th century Romanesque church, the Ruins of San Isidoro, admiring the graceful arcs of the marble.

I then encountered an area I find more intriguing each time I visit. The shuttered green buildings and the open central pit used to be home to monkeys, giraffes, elephants and bears. La Casa de Fieras, Retiro’s zoo, was a main attraction for almost 200 years, only closing its doors in 1972.

(The zoo has a shameful history. In 1887, set up next to the animal cages was a human zoo composed of “43 indigenous Filipinos, a Negro, several Tagalogs, the Chamorros, the Carolinos, the Moros de Jolo and a group of Bisayas,” according to researcher and author Christian Baez.)

Leaving the former zoo, I came to a set of stone lions guarding an arched walkway fit for a wedding procession.

Running through them like a bride fleeing the altar, I passed two duck ponds, then entered Los Jardines de Cecilio Rodriguez. Rodriguez was Retiro’s main gardener at the turn of the 20th century, and his graceful touch can be found everywhere. Checkered paths weave through gardens framed by alabaster ivy-wrapped columns, trimmed cypress trees, box hedges, pergolas and ponds with floating lilies.

A pop of cobalt blue and fluorescent green suddenly emerged in front of me, stopping me mid-stride as I gaped at this creature in my path.

The proud peacock walked daintily down the stone steps, showing off his feathers to a bevy of cooing tourists as if he were Cinderella descending the red velvet staircase. But he wasn’t the only peacock. As I looked around, I realized that they were everywhere, peacocks meandering right and left across the lawn and stone steps. It was obviously their home, and we were the uninvited guests; they could have been the reincarnation of the princesses and kings who once strolled these gardens, shunning visitors from the outside.

For at one point, only the royal family and the aristocracy could enter the park. It was designed in the 1600s specifically to be a retreat (retiro) for the kings, and even held a second palace. Over time, the general public was sparingly permitted access to pieces of the park, until Queen Isabella II was deposed by La Gloria — the Spanish revolution — in 1868, and all of the park’s wonders finally became open to everyone.

An outdoor orchestra

The next time I spun into the park, I was swept away by a different one of my senses — hearing. Each curve in the path presented a new panoply of pitches and melodies. First it was a wrinkled Spaniard in front of the Palacio Cristal twinkling his hands across glass flutes, his notes piercing the air with the clarity of the waterfall descending across from me.

The Palacio Cristal epitomizes what the Spanish would call “tranquila.” The glimmering crystal palace invites you in, while swans linger on the pond in front. Once exhibiting tropical plants from the Philippines, the former greenhouse now hosts rotating art exhibitions. When I ventured in, I encountered a ceramic snow-white man atop his gallant horse, and a ceramic woman lounging nude across the way.

Ambling back to the lake, I encountered a young violinist and violist indulging in the dulcet harmonies of Mozart, their bows frolicking across the strings with the skill of seasoned musicians.
Finally, I stopped to lounge on the elegant white marble steps of the palatial Monumento del Alfonso Rey III. The sun was setting over the lake, and as a jazz guitarist with tousled dark hair spun solos, the notes seemed to bleed into the orange and fuchsia streaks drenching the sky.

The thread unifying all of the park’s musicians was joy — rather than play for euros, they plied their instruments with the tenderness of musicians who play for themselves.

Books and roses

Parque Retiro is also a bastion for books. Real books, with pages you can touch and words that can channel you to an enchanted jungle far away as the breeze licks your hair, without a text message jerking you back to reality with a hissing buzz.

Every day, book sellers set up their wooden stalls on the Cuesta de Moyano, featuring ancient maps of disappeared Spanish cities and worn copies of novels about the Spanish Civil War.

Once a year, a huge book fair — el Féria del Libro — fills a half-mile of the park. When I went, it was packed with book lovers, giving the writer in me hope that the written word is not, in fact, dead.

On my next journey, I encountered a rose garden so marvelous I was embarrassed to enter in such plebeian attire. Designed in 1915, La Rosaleda bursts with wine-colored, magenta, peach and soft pink roses, many from France and Denmark, laid out in a circular design. Stone angels peer out over the roses as they trickle water into elaborate fountains. I vowed to return in crimson lipstick and my finest ballgown. The garden is at its fullest bloom in late April through early June.

French roses were a fitting transition to the stately French gardens, La Parterre, which gracefully lead to the Prado. At one time, the grandest of Italian operas were performed here. As a former opera singer and thespian, I became enamored of the gray statue in the middle, a mourning woman holding a theatrical mask atop the head of a stately gentleman. He was Jacinto Benavente, a Spanish playwright and winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1922, and she the representation of his works. I appreciate that about the park — rather than every statue representing a general or a king, playwrights, poets, writers and their stories are peppered throughout, showing an appreciation of the cultural side of history.

Although my time in Spain is dwindling, I plan to spend as much of it as I can running through Retiro’s gardens and serpentine trails. Or perhaps I’ll ditch my Nikes and dance among the roses in my finest attire the way the queen once did.


Karlin is a writer based in Madrid and the District. Her website is samanthabkarlin.com. Find her on twitter: @samanthakarlin1 


If you go

Where to stay

Hotel Urban
Carrera de S. Jerónimo, 34
011-34-917-87-77-70
One of the few hotels in Madrid with a rooftop pool, it caters to the trendy city crowd and has a panoramic wraparound deck, funky ancient art and warm hospitality. Rooms from about $230 per night.

The Westin Palace
Plaza de las Cortes, 7
011-34-913-60-80-00
If you fancy sipping an old fashioned in the seat where Ernest Hemingway once relaxed next to the piano bar, this is the spot for you. This sprawling grand hotel was built by the order of King Alfonso Rey in 1912. During the Spanish civil war, it was temporarily converted into a military hospital. Rooms from about $330 per night.
 
Only You Boutique Hotel
Calle del Barquillo, 21
011-34- 910-05-22-22
Once a 19th-century palace, its current incarnation was made for honeymooners. Romantic winsome phrases are scrawled across wooden corks, and velvet plush seating invites lovers to hold hands while they canoodle. Rooms from about $210 per night.

Where to eat

Amazonico
Calle Jorge Juan, 20
011-34-915-15-43-32
Amazonico’s lush green foliage and outdoor garden will make you feel like you’re in the heart of the Brazilian Amazon. The grilled meats and caramelized pineapple are delectable. Enjoy live jazz and dancing at its see-and-be-seen cocktail bar below. Entrees start at $20.

Numa Pompilio
Calle de Velázquez, 18
011-34- 916-85-97-19
Elegant greenhouses and a garden that feels like Adam and Eve’s paradise, Numa Pompilio offers homemade pasta, truffles galore and other Italian fare for the well-heeled. It’s worth it alone for the black focaccia bread. Entrees start at $25.

Toga Restaurante
Calle de Juanelo, 23
011-34- 910-41-44-39
An eclectic fusion restaurant combining Spanish, Argentine and Italian cuisines, Toga delights foodies with its creative gastronomic combinations in a cozy, laid back setting. Sea bass, cuttlefish risotto and Chinese noodles with red tuna stand out. Entrees start at $14.
 
Florida Retiro
Paseo República de Panamá 1
011-34- 918-27-52-75
On weekend evenings, I often find myself in a crocheted Spanish sundress holding a glass of shimmering cold rosé with friends at Florida Retiro. The latter is actually made up a variety of venues, including a nightclub, a formal restaurant featuring a dinner show and a laid-back patio with tapas and live music. This is the spot for gin and tonics and a lovely terrace with Madrid’s trendsetting locals. Entrees start at $22.

What to do

El Parque Retiro
Plazade la Independencia, 7
Park hours are 6 a.m. to midnight April through September and 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. October through March. Admission is free. Rowboat rentals on the park’s lake cost $7 Monday through Fridays, $9 Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays; hours are seasonal. For more information, call 34-91-574-40-24. Visitors can also ride on a solar-powered boat Tuesday through Sunday and holidays; hours are seasonal. Rides cost about $2.

Information






Saturday, December 13, 2014

When The Customer Values Green

  More than just telling a story of turning what was once "trash" into a commodity, this story tells of how a company realized that having a lighter environmental impact was important to their customers!!!! From The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Palermo's finds a way to recycle less-than-perfect pizza crusts

Company supports efforts to make Menomonee Valley 'green'

As workers on the rapid-fire pizza line at Palermo Villa Inc. are churning out nearly 1 million frozen pizzas a day, every perfectly round crust makes it onto the line.
But flawed pies — the ones that are cracked, somehow missed a key ingredient, or don't quite make it into the coveted circle shape — won't move down the line to get doused with sauce.
So they end up on the floor. From there, they used to be tossed in the trash.
Instead of that, workers at Palermo's now toss the faulty crusts into a brown bin that ends up keeping something edible out of the landfill.
Every year, Palermo's is sending 900 tons of pizza crusts to a waste processor, where they are ground up and then distributed as animal feed for livestock.
Feeding animals instead of filling a landfill is among the achievements that made Palermo's the Distinguished Performer in the Environment category this year on the Deloitte Wisconsin 75 list of closely held companies.
Palermo's moved its headquarters to the Menomonee Valley in 2006, deciding to open in what had been a brownfield. Since then it has been working in concert with Menomonee Valley Partners in efforts to "green" the valley, said Laurie Fallucca, Palermo's chief creative officer. That includes support for Three Bridges Park and the Urban Ecology Center's valley campus, as well as work by company employees who help as part of Palermo's stewardship crew.
The Palermo's "stew crew" heads out, usually at midday on Fridays, to help keep the Hank Aaron State Trail tidy and to prevent invasive plants from overtaking native plantings. Palermo's is one of about a dozen companies or neighborhood groups with stewardship crews.
"It's neat to be able to get out and walk the trail in the middle of the day," said Jessica Rautmann, a member of the crew. "People riding bikes will stop and thank us for picking up garbage, so it's a really good feeling."
Sometimes Palermo's is paying extra for its green initiatives. The company has been using cardboard from recycled pulp, with the Sustainable Forestry Initiative logo on it, for both its pizza boxes and the "master cases" that deliver a dozen pizzas at a time to the supermarket.
In all, that's more than 15 million pounds of cardboard a year. Going with the greener packaging option costs the company more, Fallucca said, and Palermo's did marketing surveys to gauge whether consumers really cared about whether the Sustainable Forestry logo was on the package.
"A lot of companies are moving to that. All of that is a lot more expensive than the other packaging, but since we've moved in here we've always done that," Fallucca said.
"If we didn't have to do this, it would cost us less," she said. "We've definitely done research. We're always like, 'Do people really care?' The answer is: 'Yes, they do.'"
Other environmental work at the company included the installation of energy-saving occupancy-sensor lighting in the factory and converting to LED lighting, as well as recycling tons of cardboard, plastic and plastic drums.
The company also donates dozens of large plastic food barrels that are reused as rain barrels in neighborhood gardens in Milwaukee.
Though Palermo's has had labor challenges in recent years, the company has carved out a "slice" for stewardship in its pizza-shaped corporate mission statement.
The company employs 645 people and is finding more and more that new hires want their company to be a good citizen, she said.
"We have a large group of millennials working here. They grew up on 'reduce, reuse, recycle,' so for them it's been a big part of how they grew up," she said.

http://www.jsonline.com/business/palermos-finds-a-way-to-recycle-less-than-perfect-pizza-crusts-b99361422z1-277892451.html

Old Dogs Learn New Tricks

Hmmm........ charging for shopping bags changes behavior..... from The Washington Post -


The surprising reason why those 5 cent charges for plastic bags actually work

November 13, 2014

If you live in Washington, you know the drill: After bagging your groceries, the checkout machine asks you how many bags you used. And if you used plastic or disposable bags (rather than bags you brought on your own), you have to pay 5 cents per bag. The District passed a law requiring as much in 2009 -- a policy that states like New Jersey and New York are also considering, and that has been adopted around the world from Ireland and Scotland to South Africa.
Some localities have gone farther still -- California and Hawaii have effectively banned plastic bags outright -- but recent research suggests that charges or fees can also be effective (and have the added benefit of being less coercive). Moreover, it suggests that they work, at least in part, through a surprising mechanism. It's not just the relatively minor added cost, on its own, that impels people to stop using plastic bags and to instead bring their own bags with them to the store. Rather, it's the way this small change disrupts habitual behaviors and helps people draw a tighter linkage between the environmental awareness that they already possess, and actions in the world that actually advance that consciousness and their values.
Such is the upshot of a new study on plastic bag charges published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology by a team of Argentinian researchers, led by psychologist Adriana Jakovcevic of Buenos Aires University. Charging a relatively small amount for bags "produces changes in behavior," says Jakovcevic, "and these changes are not only because of the economic value of the incentive -- there are also some other processes at play that involve environmental concerns."
As the researchers note, Buenos Aires provides a perfect opportunity to study the effects of plastic bag charges because in 2012, the vast city's Environmental Protection Agency put in place bag restrictions that in turn led the leading supermarket chain association to institute a bag charge (the equivalent of 2.5 U.S. cents for bags of medium size and 4 cents for large bags) Oct. 9, 2012. For smaller supermarket associations, meanwhile, the same charge went into effect roughly two months later on Dec. 10, 2012. But for Gran Buenos Aires, the larger area that surrounds the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), there was no change instituted at all.
This is, the researchers note, a "natural experiment": You have three groups of supermarket shoppers, two of which experienced new bag charges at different times, and one of which did not experience plastic bag charges at all. So the researchers conducted several field studies, observing shoppers leaving supermarkets in low-to-middle income areas in the three different regions at different times -- before any policies went into place, after the first change, and after the second change.
The result was that sure enough, the policies greatly increased the percentage of shoppers who were observed to be carrying their own bag. Here's a figure from their study, showing the effects for the first set of supermarkets to institute the charge (CABA1), the second set (CABA2), and for supermarkets in Gran Buenos Aires that never saw a bag charge instituted (GBA). Consumers were observed at four times: before any policies took place (Time 1), just after the first policy affected CABA1 (Time 2), four weeks after the policy change (Time 3), and then shortly after the second policy affected CABA2 (Time 4):




Clearly, the bag fees worked to dramatically increase the habit of people carrying their own bags. But importantly, in a second study that involved directly interviewing consumers who were observed to leave supermarkets carrying either plastic bags or their own bags, the researchers tried to get at why they had begun to adopt this new behavior, rather than paying the relatively small bag charges that had been instituted.
First, it turned out that a surprising number of people didn't like the bag charge policy, but started carrying their own bags anyway. According to Jakovcevic, it is likely that the small economic cost is the best way of explaining the behavior of these individuals. Past research, however, has called into question whether a purely economic effect like this is a lasting one, with sustained influence on behavior.
But there was another group of Argentinian shoppers -- those who supported the charge and carried their own bags for reasons of environmental concern. They cared much less about economics and much more about green motives. "The people who supported the policy most, they also say they do it for environmental reasons," says Jakovcevic, "and this is a stronger finding because it was an open question, the people could say anything that comes into their mind, and most of them say it was to protect the environment." For these shoppers, says Jakovcevic, the policy provided an opportunity to "rethink why they are using plastic bags or their own bags, and if they care about the environment, this will push them to change their behavior and change it longer over time."
Thus, the paper concludes that the bag charge might have worked "both by the activation of pre-existent pro-environmental attitudes and by a direct effect of the charge on behavior." In addition, it suggests that the new policy worked in another way as well -- by being disruptive of the status quo and changing people's default options and choices. "After the introduction of the plastic bag charge, customers had to explicitly approve or request to obtain a bag and pay for it," notes the study. They couldn't just get one without thinking about it.
So just maybe, a little 5 cent charge can indeed help the environment. You don't have to confiscate all the plastic bags in the world to save the environment (enraging anyone from industry to the Tea Party in the process). You can just give people the slightest push, and let them fix the problem themselves.

Chris Mooney reports on science and the environment.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/13/the-surprising-reason-why-those-5-cent-charges-for-plastic-bags-actually-work/?tid=hpModule_79c38dfc-8691-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z17

Monday, August 18, 2014

Nuclear Power - Corporate Welfare

Ahh, the things that amaze me........ from The Washington Post's Wonkblog comes the following account of corporate welfare. Yet people worry that subsidies to homeowners for roof top solar is a giveaway......


Why is the Obama administration using taxpayer money to back a nuclear plant that’s already being built?

  February 21, 2014



If nuclear power is such a good idea, why does it need financial help from U.S. taxpayers?
This week, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz announced that the Obama administration would extend a $6.5 billion federal loan guarantee to cover part of the cost of building two new reactors at Southern Co.’s Alvin W. Vogtle site. Thursday he went to Waynesboro, Ga. to finalize the deal. Another $1.8 billion in guarantees could come soon.
The impact: Southern’s Georgia Power subsidiary, which owns 46 percent of the project, will save $225 million to $250 million because the loan guarantee will reduce interest costs. Instead of borrowing from a commercial bank, Southern can now borrow at rock bottom rates from the government’s Federal Financing Bank. And you, gentle reader, the taxpayer, take on all the risk if the project goes bust. Does the name Solyndra ring a bell?
If that’s not enough, Southern is also getting help from the federal production tax credit and other federal incentives that will ultimately save the company an additional $2 billion or so, Southern’s chief executive Tom Fanning said on a Jan. 29 conference call about earnings.
“This is a deeply subsidized project that will cost the taxpayers a lot,” said Ken Glozer, a former Office of Management and Budget senior official who is president of a consulting firm OMB Professionals.
Southern has said it didn’t need the loan guarantee to finish the project. But the guarantee doesn’t hurt.
The company also says that it will pass along the savings in financing costs to Georgia electricity ratepayers, but those ratepayers are already footing a large chunk of the reactors’ construction costs. Usually ratepayers only pay such costs once a generating station is in operation, not while it’s being built. In December, the Georgia Public Service Commission approved a three-year plan to spread out $465 million in rate increases, according to Wells Fargo Securities analysts. Southern said customer rates once the units are in service would rise between 6 and 8 percent, less than the 12 percent increase originally projected for capital costs.
This is all part of a bigger picture. Less than a decade ago, the nuclear industry was anticipating a renaissance, fueled by hopes that climate concerns about fossil fuels would trump safety worries and would help rally support beyond the industry’s usual allies. Congress tried to do its part by approving in the 2005 Energy Policy Act a $17.5 billion program of nuclear loan guarantees.
But even with that help, building a nuclear plant is extremely expensive, and for a single utility, even a large one, to undertake such a project means betting the farm, as former Duke Energy chief executive Jim Rogers once put it. Moreover, costs rose since 2005. While Congress envisioned helping half a dozen reactors or more, the program is now expected to cover only three or four.
Then, if those challenges weren’t enough, the industry was hit by the recession, competition from low natural gas prices, and the Japanese earthquake and tsunami that destroyed three reactors at the Fukushima plant and fanned safety concerns worldwide.
It wasn’t just a perfect storm. It was three perfect storms.
Moniz said the Vogtle project was “not only a major milestone in the Administration’s commitment to jumpstart the U.S. nuclear power industry, it is also an important part of our all-of-the-above approach to American energy as we move toward a low-carbon energy future.”
Many experts say it’s not the sort of milestone Congress and the industry once had in mind. The nuclear industry is nearly halfway through a more than $30 billion construction program, with the two new reactors being built in Georgia, and three others in South Carolina and Tennessee. Like the ones in Georgia, a pair under construction in South Carolina can rely on a state law allowing costs to be passed along to customers while construction is in progress. The fifth is being built by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
But while five reactors are under construction, four others have closed down or announced plans to close down. Two cited competition from natural gas plants and two others faced large repair and upgrading costs. The renaissance seems to be stillborn.
Proponents of nuclear power are still trying, though, and they say that the loan guarantee and production tax credits aren’t any different from what wind and solar projects get. Level playing field and all that. Besides, Southern says, Solyndra was a new company with a new technology whereas Southern has been around for roughly a century and nuclear power plants have been in operation for decades.
“Loan guarantees have been in place for years and are a successful vehicle used by the federal government to ensure investment in critical infrastructure projects,” Marvin Fertel, president of the Nuclear Energy Institute, said.
The Vogtle loan guarantee had been conditionally approved by the Obama administration four years ago, and Southern is already well into construction — although it’s running about 21 months behind schedule according to the anti-nuclear group Public Citizen. (You can see photos of the project’s progress here.) The reactors are Westinghouse AP1000 models, a new generation reactor.
Wells Fargo last month lowered its earnings outlook for Southern, citing “construction risk” from the nuclear reactors as well as a modern coal plant under construction — and over budget — in Mississippi. Now that risk belongs to all of us.
“No doubt, this is a bad deal for the American people who have been put on the hook for a project that is both embroiled in delays and cost overruns and to a company that has publicly stated that it does not need federal loans to complete the project,” Allison Fisher, Outreach Director, Public Citizen’s Energy Program said. “This is a classic case of throwing good money after bad – an unnecessary and unconscionable decision to make with taxpayer money.”

Bonus fact: The reactor site in Georgia is named after the late Alvin Ward Vogtle Jr., former chairman of Southern. Vogtle was an Army Air Force pilot in World War II, and flew more than 30 missions before crash-landing in North Africa and being taken to a prisoner of war camp in Germany. On his fifth attempt, he escaped by scaling a 14-foot barbed-wire border fence and crossing to Switzerland. The character Steve McQueen played in the 1963 film “The Great Escape” was based on recollections of several veterans, including Vogtle.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/02/21/why-is-the-obama-administration-using-taxpayer-money-to-back-a-nuclear-plant-thats-already-being-built/?hpid=z4 



Nuclear Power Subsidies: The Gift that Keeps on Taking


Sunday, August 17, 2014

Solar Power Farm At New England College

   I recently saw this solar power farm at Stonehill College in Massachusetts - fantastic to see!


One of Nation’s Largest College Campus Solar Fields Being Built at Stonehill

January 6, 2014





A 15-acre solar field is being built on an unused parcel of land across from Stonehill College’s main campus on Route 138 in Easton. Scheduled to be completed early in 2014, it will be 2.7 megawatts in size and contain 9,000 solar panels which will make it the 11th (tied) largest solar installation on a college campus nationwide and the largest on a New England college campus according to the Association for Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) database.
The solar field is expected to save the College over $185,000 a year or an estimated $3.2 million over the course of a 15-year contract it has signed with New Jersey-based Marina Energy.  The energy produced is expected to account for 20% of Stonehill’s electrical usage.

Protecting God’s Creation

The impetus for the solar field is not just financial. The project also aligns with Stonehill’s strategic commitment to building a culture of sustainability on campus and ties in with the College’s Catholic ethos.
“The solar field is an extension to our Catholic commitment to care for creation and sustainability. It gives further indication of our commitment, on every level, to preserving the resources that are in our care for future generations,” says Rev. James Lies, C.S.C., the College’s vice president for mission.
“As Catholics, we are called upon by God to be good stewards of the earth and the natural world. We have a responsibility to use our gifts and expertise to advocate for environmental justice and to create sustainable development options,”   explains Fr. Lies.
In 2012, Stonehill became the 12th Catholic college in the United States to sign the St. Francis Pledge, which is a public promise to protect God’s creation and the environment, and to advocate for those who are impacted the most by global climate change. The pledge is named in honor of St. Francis of Assisi who is the patron saint of the environment and of animals. 

Good Stewards

Across a variety of fronts, Stonehill has taken numerous actions towards sustainability. For example, in 2012 the College phased out bottled water usage and in 2011 created The Farm at Stonehill, which supplies local food banks, soup kitchens and other meal providers with organic, sustainably grown fruits and vegetables.
Other initiatives have included composting cafeteria waste, introducing the Zip Car car-sharing option, single stream recycling and other waste reducing programs.
Once the solar field is completed, students and visitors of the College will be able to monitor the energy output from the solar field in real time on a screen which will be housed in the College’s Shield Science Center.
In addition to the 15-acre solar field, the College has also installed roof-top solar panels on two of its facilities storage buildings and has plans to install more roof-top panels throughout campus in the future.

Sustainable Partnerships

Solect Energy of Hopkinton, MA, the leading commercial solar energy project developer in the state, is building the solar field while the entire project is being overseen by Power Management, Inc., an energy consulting firm which manages over 15,000 commercial and industrial utility meters throughout North America.
“Sustainability is very much part of our strategic plan and we are alert to new opportunities,” says Craig Binney, Stonehill’s associate vice president for finance and operations.  
Through a connection with two Stonehill alumni, David Cohen ’93 and Richard Tepper ’86, College officials met with Power Management in 2011.
“We liked what we heard and, after speaking with its Vice President Kevin Kelly, we saw an opportunity for a significant sustainable initiative Binney notes.
“Solar projects take a long time to complete and it’s necessary to have a ‘champion’ for the project and I cannot say enough about the Stonehill team, especially Craig and Jeanne Finlayson (Vice President for Finance).  Despite a few setbacks with the project along the way, they really moved things along and it has been such a pleasure working with them over these last two and a half years,” Kelly says.
Solect Energy broke ground on the project beginning this fall and expects the field to be completed over the next few months.
“It has been a pleasure working in collaboration with Stonehill, Power Management and Marina Energy on a project of this magnitude,” says Scott Howe, Partner at Solect Energy Development. “Stonehill is establishing itself as a shining example of how a college can reap the benefits of making a huge commitment to sustainability by using renewable solar energy to power its campus.”
Marina Energy, which owns and operates the field, commends Stonehill for its commitment to renewable energy.
“We credit Stonehill for its forward-thinking strategies which will put the College in a strong position to lead others in New England to a more sustainable future. As more and more institutions like Stonehill College turn to cleaner, renewable sources of energy, the community thrives through financial savings and improved efficiency,” says Steve Poniatowicz, senior vice president & chief operating officer of Marina Energy.

About Stonehill

Stonehill is a selective Catholic college located near Boston on a beautiful 384-acre campus in Easton, Massachusetts. With a student-faculty ratio of 13:1, the College engages over 2,500 students in 80+ rigorous academic programs in the liberal arts, sciences, and pre-professional fields. The Stonehill community helps students to develop the knowledge, skills, and character to meet their professional goals and to live lives of purpose and integrity.

About Power Management

Power Management provides energy management and sustainability services to a diversified customer base. Founded in 1997, Power Management currently manages over 15,000 commercial and industrial utility meters throughout North America. We take energy management to a higher level through a process that includes comprehensive research, recommendation and implementation.

About Marina Energy

Marina is a wholly owned subsidiary of South Jersey Industries that develops, owns and operates on-site energy projects that include district heating and cooling, combined heat and power, solar and landfill gas-to-electric. Marina has gained significant project experience through partnering with higher education institutions within New Jersey.

About Solect Energy

Solect is a full-service solar photovoltaic (PV) project developer based in Massachusetts, delivering smart solar solutions to help businesses and organizations reduce energy costs. As an industry leader in commercial solar energy, Solect takes a practical approach to the development, installation and on-going support of each system. Solect partners closely with customers, providing strong financial insight and solar technology expertise to optimize their investment while creating a positive impact on the environment. 
The company currently has 10 MW (megawatts) of systems completed and under development, with a primary focus on New England-based commercial, light industrial, and institutional property owners. Visit www.solect.com for more information.

http://www.stonehill.edu/news-media/news/details/one-of-nations-largest-college-campus-solar-fields-being-built-at-stonehill/





Sunday, July 13, 2014

Earth First - No Compromise In The Defense Of Mother Earth

    I got this sticker a few years ago at Green Fest in Washington, DC -


Monday, May 19, 2014

School Cafeteria Sustainability

    Step by step.......

Montgomery schools ending the era of the foam lunch tray

By Donna St. George, Published: May 18, 2014

Luis Pozo’s lunch tray was the size of a notebook, a thin cardboard rectangle he used to carry his noon meal through the cafeteria of Francis Scott Key Middle School in Silver Spring.
The eighth-grader loaded it with chocolate milk, potato rounds, a burger and a fruit cup. When he was done, he stacked the tray onto a growing pile.
“They can be recycled,” Luis said. “If we don’t recycle, we’re going to destroy our planet.”
It was a sign of times to come in Montgomery County, as Maryland’s largest school system leaves behind the long era of the polystyrene lunch tray for a more environmentally friendly replacement that will be used to serve up nearly 15 million school meals a year.
Starting in the fall, Montgomery expects to stock lunch lines from Clarksburg to Silver Spring with trays that are recyclable.
The change comes as schools across the region and nationwide aim to go greener and yet not overspend. Arlington replaced its foam trays with cardboard four years ago, and six urban school systems, including New York and Chicago, joined forces to leverage their buying power to get better prices on more environmentally friendly trays and healthier foods.
“We’re now seeing a revolution in cafeterias around the country ditching polystyrene and moving toward compostable trays,” said Mark Izeman, a senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. For Montgomery, he said, “this is a great move from an environmental and public health standpoint.”
For many districts, one of the biggest obstacles to scrapping polystyrene (which many refer to by the trademark “Styrofoam”) has been price.
“The conventional wisdom was they were too cheap to change,” says Eric Goldstein, chief executive officer for school support services in the New York City Department of Education. New York alone has 1.1 million students, many of them using foam trays “that go right into the landfill,” he said.
During the 2014-15 school year, Goldstein said New York and its five partner districts — the Urban School Food Alliance — will move from polystyrene to a compostable round plate with compartments.
“We’re very excited about this,” he said. “We’re already hearing from other districts that want to copy us.”
In Montgomery, Marla Caplon, director of food and nutrition services, said polystyrene goes back to the 1970s and that she’d received quotes as high as 28 cents each for cardboard trays, nearly 10 times more. But the gap began closing in recent years, she said, and the district has worked with a manufacturer to create a new product.
The new trays at Key Middle cost 4.3 cents each, which would mean a hike of about $140,000 a year. “It’s close enough to where we can stretch,” she said. The bid process for next year is underway.
At Key Middle, cardboard trays have been tried out since late April and have been welcomed. Key was a 2012 national green ribbon school, and it has a strong environmental focus.
In the din of a recent lunch hour, students filled trays with French bread pizza, baked cheese dippers, yogurt, burgers and chicken patty sandwiches.
A few students said the cardboard can be wobbly, so sometimes an apple or a milk jug will roll off the tray. Some spoke of environmental advantages.
“Even though it’s kind of a small step, I think maybe it can spread out to other schools and do something for our environment,” said Yemi Djayeola, 13.
The foam trays have been a passionate focus for students with the Young Activist Club at Piney Branch Elementary, who had campaigned and raised $10,000 to bring reusable plastic trays and a dishwasher to their school. Margot Bloch, 13, now in middle school and still a member of the club, called cardboard trays a major improvement.
“It’s a really good step to move from polystyrene to paper trays, but we would still like to see our dishwasher pilot happen,” Margot said.
Caplon said Montgomery’s polystyrene trays were not tossed into a landfill and did not go entirely to waste. They were incinerated, she said, in a process that produces energy. The cardboard trays will be recycled unless they are splattered with food; they are also compostable.
In the Washington region’s school systems, not everyone takes the same approach. In D.C. public schools, all disposable items must be reusable, recyclable, made of recycled materials or easily compostable. In Fairfax County, polystyrene lunch trays are taken to a plant in Lorton, where they are processed into electricity, said schools spokesman John Torre.
By contrast, Prince William County washes its reusable plastic trays, and Loudoun County relies on a foam tray that officials say is environmentally friendly. Prince George’s County’s lunch trays are not recyclable but are biodegradable, so they break down in a landfill, officials said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/montgomery-schools-ending-the-era-of-the-foam-lunch-tray/2014/05/18/3f083244-d537-11e3-8a78-8fe50322a72c_story.html?hpid=z4